EXCUSE ME?
So, in essence, California is saying that cancer doesn't discriminate, but they do? I'm not certain, but I imagine this snapshot is indicative of the national picture as well.
Reconstruction is an important part of the healing process, in my opinion. I have not yet undergone reconstructive surgery, but view it in my mind as a sort of "rite of passage" from victim to survivor. Allowing the cost of the surgery to deter a woman from feeling whole again is adding insult to injury, and is particularly offensive to me. Cancer doesn't pick and choose it's victims by their economic demographic, and surgeons who perform reconstructive surgeries shouldn't choose their patients that way either. New York State law mandates that health insurance policies providing medical and surgical coverage are required to pay for costs of breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. That's the way it should be. Wonder why that isn't yet a nationally adopted policy? Ask any Health Insurance Provider. I'm sure the response will be... interesting, to say the least.
Reconstruction is an important part of the healing process, in my opinion. I have not yet undergone reconstructive surgery, but view it in my mind as a sort of "rite of passage" from victim to survivor. Allowing the cost of the surgery to deter a woman from feeling whole again is adding insult to injury, and is particularly offensive to me. Cancer doesn't pick and choose it's victims by their economic demographic, and surgeons who perform reconstructive surgeries shouldn't choose their patients that way either. New York State law mandates that health insurance policies providing medical and surgical coverage are required to pay for costs of breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. That's the way it should be. Wonder why that isn't yet a nationally adopted policy? Ask any Health Insurance Provider. I'm sure the response will be... interesting, to say the least.
